“Nothing is more responsible for the good old days than a bad memory”.
- Franklin P. Adams
“The trouble with most folks isn’t so much their ignorance, as knowing so many things that ain’t so.”
- Josh Billings

There are times in life when doing the right thing can actually save you money. I can’t begin to list all of the examples of how this has played out in my personal life, but I would like to discuss this in terms of public education. You may realize by now that I am not a writer, and I am certainly not a diplomat or politician. I am an artist married to a writer, and we are trying to raise 3 children – one with special needs – in my home state of Texas.
The Texas state legislature meets only once every 2 years. It’s a wild time, and if what you need to happen doesn’t happen during the session, you have a long wait before you’ll get another shot. Sounds simple enough, until you talk about critical education bills that need to happen before your kid ages out of the system.
Last session, I decided to get heavily involved in the process. We had been sucker punched by the public elementary school, and we were fast realizing that the private schools we could afford for our son were not prepared for his relatively minor but still very significant special needs. I contacted our newly-elected state representative to discuss the Ohio Autism Scholarship program and to let him know that this is the sort of thing that would allow us to get our son into a program where he could actually learn. Autistic kids don’t just “not learn” when they’re in an inappropriate classroom setting – they regress quickly, they lose previously acquired skills, they are destroyed. The state representative’s name was Allen Vaught, and we kept in touch, sometimes emailing 10 or more times per day throughout the legislative session. Allen has a good heart. He understands my family. There is no way he could not get it after all the time I spent communicating directly with him 2 years ago. A bill called SB1000 modelled on Ohio’s successful program was filed by Senator Florence Shapiro, and that’s when it all fell apart for Allen and me. SB1000 would have allowed us to transfer our son within the district, into another district or take a certain amount of money to an appropriate private education. The private education thing is supposed to be offered up when the public schools cannot educate a child – but in Texas, federal education law is usually ignored. Allen’s campaign was largely paid for by a group called the Texas Parent PAC, and when the PAC said jump, Allen obediently said how high.
In the process, he threw my son under the bus, and by the end of the session, Allen could no longer look me in the eye. I am a registered Democrat. I gave him my vote and months of time that would have been better spent trying to learn how to home school my son. After all, I’m not a teacher. To his credit, Allen asked me to find the program that was right for my son in any of the 4 school districts in our state house district 107 and he would ensure that my son got into that program. He essentially offered to do for me what I could have done for myself with SB1000. I think the last thing I asked before the session ended was if it would be alright to give his contact info to the rest of the autism parents in the state so he could hook them up this way, as well. Haven’t heard from him since.
So it’s election time again, and a few things have changed in our world. A virtual academy charter school option was created for Texas. I enrolled my son, and he is doing better in this setting than he has in any other setting we’ve been able to access. The man running against Allen Vaught is a guy named Bill Keffer. I decided to investigate Keffer since Vaught is too ashamed (and rightly so) to continue speaking with me. I quickly learned that Bill Keffer was our state representative before losing the spot to Vaught (remember all that Parent PAC money?). I also learned that Keffer was on the House Education Committee and worked on legislation that eventually brought my son’s current school into existence. It got him back in school along with hundreds of other children. It’s not perfect, but it exists as an option for parents. We really don’t need perfection, just progression toward more education and less suckyness. There are 2 people on Bill Keffer’s staff who have a lot of knowledge about autism – one is a former autism classroom teacher, and the other is the parent of an autistic child. Sounds interesting, doesn’t it?
I decided to meet with him to find out if this was some sort of gimmick to overthrow Vaught or what – and I was astonished to realize that Bill Keffer really doesn’t know all that much about autism. He just fell into this situation where he is surrounded by it on a daily basis, kinda like me – and it made him eager to learn more. I now have 2 candidates who “get it” – only I now know for sure that Allen Vaught, despite his understanding of the situation, is not going to do anything for our kids. He’s a tool of the folks who paid his way. I’m not sure if Bill Keffer will be any better, but education is my focus since it’s the single most daunting task in my everyday life, and I do know that Keffer gets it – and Keffer isn’t the Texas Parent PAC’s golden child, Allen Vaught. Voting helpless Allen Vaught out of office is a step toward less suckyness – and that’s what we want!
We talk about The Wizard of Oz a lot in the local autism community, because there are so many flying monkeys to handle all the time. Sticking with that theme, if we could take the tin man with his new heart and merge him with the scarecrow and his nice new brain, we could have a district that cares about the education of all of our children. And we could have a district that refuses to throw more cash at Dallas ISD (as well as the others) without strict financial accountability. There’s a lot of money being spent on private law firms because of the failure to provide an appropriate education to special needs students. Dallas, Garland, Richardson and Mesquite are all guilty of this. The law firms cook up trouble between the schools and the parents so the parents withdraw the kid, leaving tax dollars behind, or – better yet – file due process and let the big public dollars flow to the private law firms. It’s big business, and I know I don’t want to throw more cash at school districts when this sort of fiscally irresponsible scheme is the norm.
If you’ve bothered to read this far, please understand that I am still a registered Democrat. But I’m the kind who’s done a little thinking. When parents of special needs children have enough options to get their kids safely and appropriately educated, your money will not go to fund all of these private law firms. Your tax dollars will go to education, not to bottom feeders who benefit from conflict. I don’t expect people to stop everything and care about my kid. I’m not naive. But you’re throwing money away when you continue feeding the public schools without addressing this kind of misuse of taxpayer dollars.
My kid was 8 when I got involved. He’s 10 now. A few more legislative sessions and he’ll be an adult. Get these kids appropriately educated now so they can become productive, tax-paying citizens as adults. If we continue funding private law firms disguised as public education, many of these kids will land in state-funded group homes as adults, and boy will you pay then. Let’s not get all emotional when the Allen Vaughts of the world squawk about school choice or vouchers or anything else that will create more options for these kids to get an education. Let’s think about where the money is really going and take this opportunity to have a heart and use our brains.
Dear Unworthy Bum,
(First, I would suggest a less self-deprecating name.) You are a good writer and expressed yourself well.
It was encouraging to read your post. Why encouraging? you say. Because I am searching Texas for people just like you that will acknowledge and do something about the tragedy of our government school system. I have been fighting this battle, mostly on the sidelines, for 15 years; but this year I have decided to jump in the deep end and work on a statewide grassroots organization focused on this one issue. As I’ve said on one of my posts, I am not a Dem or Rep, I’m a school choicer.
As you can see at my website, I am focused on the whole enchilada, school choice for every child in Texas. The two reasons are:
it will bring the most benefit to most kids and create a more innovative market for education
Tactically it gives every parent in Texas a reason to encourage their legislators to vote for the bill
I have identified a mother in Plano with a dyslexic child who wants to be involved in organizing parents. I will tell her to visit your blog and let her introduce herself. My guess is that she is Republican, but this issue transcends party.
We are calling ourselves Texans for Educational Options (TEO) because the African American organization’s acronym is BAEO and the Hispanics is HCREO. The charitable side of our effort is called Austin CEO Foundation.
If you know any golfers, we are having a charity tournament next Monday on Oct. 6 in Austin at the Avery Ranch Golf Course. We are tied up with this tournament for the next week, but we have plans after that.
We will have a statewide scholarship lottery. Our scheduled kickoff date is Oct. 15. We will have at least $20,000 in scholarship money. We will have the drawing at the capitol on Feb. 25. The goal is to give away some money, but more important to get a large database of parents that want more options in choosing their child’s education. Then the task is to organize these parents into a politically active team. I will post more info on my blog.
Realistically, I don’t see passing a bill this next session. That doesn’t mean that we won’t try. I am confident that I have a stalwart sponsor for a tuition tax-credit bill, Rep. Ken Paxton, that will give us a house committee hearing for the bill.
That’s all for now. Be encouraged, you’re not alone.
By: letschooseschools on September 30, 2008
at 1:47 am
Nice to meetcha, Let’s Choose. I’ll check out your website in the morning. Thanks for the encouraging words.
By: Unworthy Bum on September 30, 2008
at 1:54 am
Allen Vaught is still a better choice than Bill Keffter. Keffer only wants vouchers so the wealthy can get more financial breaks. He is a TRUE republican in every since of the word. Don’t fall for the wolf in sheeps clothing.
By: Sam on September 30, 2008
at 3:02 am
Did you even read this?
By: Unworthy Bum on September 30, 2008
at 3:10 am
Yes. I have always considered myself a Republican and I am a parent who wants the best education for my children. I have followed Texas politics closely and feel certain that Keffer is misrepresenting himself to you. I’m sorry that I don’t personally understand your struggles, but feel there is a much large picture to be seen here.
By: Sam on September 30, 2008
at 12:54 pm
You sure don’t sound like a Republican, but what do I know.
I have no loyalty to anyone but my kid – just ask Allen Vaught. I am focused on education and am perfectly aware that I would probably not like many other things about Keffer – if I looked that way. Hard to discuss my struggles if you don’t fully understand the history of SB1000 and the Ohio Autism Scholarship Program.
Moving on…
By: Unworthy Bum on September 30, 2008
at 1:02 pm
I posted the info about our scholarship lottery today. FYI
By: letschooseschools on October 1, 2008
at 12:45 am
Sounds like a frustrating situation, one in which I am not envious. It seems like you’re looking for someone to be mad at and you’ve picked Representative Vaught as your latest target.
Before you start your next slanderous attack, why don’t you take the time to get your facts straight. The Ohio scholarship issue did not even come up for a vote in the House. So Rep Vaught could not have voted against your voucher program.
It doesn’t sound like Mr. Keffer cares a whole lot about public schools.
http://www.burntorangereport.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=6334
Allen Vaught does and that’s why I’m voting for him, even though I’m a lifelong Republican.
By: BCM on October 1, 2008
at 8:45 pm
You got me thinking, so I got some facts about Rep. Vaught’s record on autism, and here is what I learned:
Only one bill dealing with autism, HB 1919, was considered on the House floor during the 2007 legislative session. HB 1919 required insurers to deal fairly with the medical consequences of autism. Under the bill, health insurers must cover prescribed treatment for autism spectrum disorder, — including speech, occupational and physical therapies and associated medication and nutritional supplements. Rep. Vaught voted for that bill. House Journal page 3971 The Ohio bill you mention was not even voted on by the Texas House.
In 2003, Bill Keffer was a member of the House Insurance Committee. Keffer’s committee considered HB 1543, very similar to the bill Allen Vaught supported in 2007. Parents of children with autism supported HB 1543. Keffer and his committee took no further action on HB 1543. There is no record of action by Keffer on any other bill directly affecting parents and families of children with autism. Keffer refused to sponsor this bill. If Keffer truly cares so about autistic children, why did he not step forward and support this legislation? Sounds like he is trying to use autistic children as a justification for his push for vouchers – not because he cares about autistic kids, but because he is a politician plain and simple.
By: Sam on October 1, 2008
at 8:59 pm
BCM: Please don’t throw around words like slanderous. We’re all adults here – you can handle this. I am fully aware that SB1000 never came up for a vote. I was also present the evening Mr. Vaught announced that he had jumped in with other house members to oppose the bill if/when a companion bill made it to the house.
I’m sorry you read anger into this. I’m really not mad at all – I just “get it” and wrote this “Allen and Me” bit to share how I got from point A to wherever it is that I am today. It’s not an attack. Down boy!
Hopefully you understand now, and thanks for stopping by to do your thing.
——————————————–
Sam – Thank you for that information. As I have repeatedly stated, I am focused on education.
Since you want to talk insurance, I will indulge you long enough to say that I am very involved in the autism community in this state and do not know of a single family that has benefitted from the new insurance law. The policy has to be funded a specific way in order for the law to apply. An awful lot of work for nuffin, wouldn’t you say?
By: Unworthy Bum on October 2, 2008
at 1:38 am
Respnding to SAM,
Sam, you state you want the “best education” for your child. I agree, clearly you do not “personally understand” the struggles of many children and their families. I agree, there is a “larger picture” here and it includes children other than your own … and families who must pay twice, once through property taxes and again through private school.
There are, for a fact, children who are harmed by the public school experience (even in the so-called “exemplary” schools) and parents who have NO CHOICE but to remove them to safety.
Public schools smile and wave goodbye to children who are not easy to serve and then transfer in their replacements … carefully screened out-of-district transfer students. If the money followed the child, the district’s smiling/waving response might change to a model of customer service. If the money followed the child, then the children who have been thrown overboard by public schools would once again be part of the “larger picture” you mentioned. They are currently invisible, especially to parents who have a child that “fits.”
***
SAM WROTE: Yes. I have always considered myself a Republican and I am a parent who wants the best education for my children. I have followed Texas politics closely and feel certain that Keffer is misrepresenting himself to you. I’m sorry that I don’t personally understand your struggles, but feel there is a much large picture to be seen here.
By: Austn Native on October 2, 2008
at 11:54 am
This is a great blog full of personal details. I appreciate a writer “giving it up” for a cause. These are tough issues to talk about when your child and a disability are involved. When it comes to our kids and their futures, that seems to be worthy of single-issue voting in my book.
I find it interesting that those who oppose the views expressed in this post (Sam and BCM) are self-proclaimed Republicans who are party-swapping to vote for Vaught based on this issue. School choice is typically a Republican-supported concept, while providing assistance to the disabled is not usually high up on their list of priorities. Perhaps this is really the hot-button for you, and not so much your pledged support of public schools.
What is so gosh-darn threatening about an accountability program to provide appropriate services to our disabled children? This is NOT a voucher or school choice issue. It is about creating incentive for our public schools to provide an appropriate education to children who have unusual and extraordinary needs who are “undesirable” for our public schools to serve. I am sickened by those who attempt to equate this issue to “tax breaks for the wealthy.” Did you not read that this writer started out with her son in the public schools? Do you have ANY information on the statistics of disabled children who start out in Texas public schools and are failed by the no-strings-attached system currently in place?
BCM – I suggest you do your homework on this, instead of crying “slander” when you clearly know nothing of which you speak. So Vaught got off easy before having to log-in his vote against SB 1000. He may have even had to take a bathroom break if and when the House was ready to weigh in. He also offered to make an under-the-table deal to his constituent to assuage a guilty conscience. Refusing to return calls from a former daily chat buddy and supporter? No longer able to look them in the eye? Good heart? Perhaps that is the only slanderous comment in the post.
****
BCM WROTE: Sounds like a frustrating situation, one in which I am not envious. It seems like you’re looking for someone to be mad at and you’ve picked Representative Vaught as your latest target.
Before you start your next slanderous attack, why don’t you take the time to get your facts straight. The Ohio scholarship issue did not even come up for a vote in the House. So Rep Vaught could not have voted against your voucher program.
By: Someone's Awfully Defensive on October 2, 2008
at 3:30 pm
It bothers me a great deal that individuals such as Sam can NOT understand the difficulties of Special Need families in Texas througout the public schools. If you know anything about Autism, ASD, Down Syndrome, Cerebral Palsy, Bipolar Disorders and other cogntive impairments you might want to do some research in the dreadful plight some families suffer in public schools in Texas. Just do a little research, find a family with a disability and see how well their child is doing. If you find a family in a private school or homeschooling, then that Special Need family is also telling you something and that the public schools FAILED their family. And then, when you add that horrendous fact that there are families being litigated against by private law firms at the hand and direction of ISD attorneys/administrators and Special Education directors then one MUST admit that there is a huge problem in this area of providing special need educational services.
Every single state acknowledges this fact from California to New York, Alaska even has a Governor with a Down Syndrome child, and Texas is smack dab in the middle.
Yes, there is a much bigger picture and the picture clearly shows that Special Need families are being denied CIVIL RIGHTS for a Free Appropriate Public Education. The private law firms MUST be stopped now and I am an activist committed to seeing change helping our families. No single Special Need family should ever be faced with litigation to HELP their child. That is the big picture if you ask me.
SAM WROTE: Yes. I have always considered myself a Republican and I am a parent who wants the best education for my children. I have followed Texas politics closely and feel certain that Keffer is misrepresenting himself to you. I’m sorry that I don’t personally understand your struggles, but feel there is a much large picture to be seen here.
By: Allinaline on October 2, 2008
at 8:35 pm
WOW! A lot of comments since my last visit. Three cheers for the parents that are fighting for a nurturing environment for their kids, that don’t “fit”.
One size doesn’t fit all. Our kids are unique and diverse in a myriad of ways. Whether it’s Autism, ASD, Down Syndrome, Cerebral Palsy, Bipolar Disorders and other cognitive impairments, or kids with no dad living in drug and gang infested parts of the city, or kids that are gifted and need a place where they can move quickly and not be held back and bored.
But that’s what the government school gives us, one size. They have no motivation to give us two, three, or one hundred sizes. They get their money up front, before they ever take one shoe out of the box.
But attach the money to the kid. Everything fundamentally changes because the economics and incentives are fundamentally changed. You want hundreds of sizes of education? Just attach the money to the kid. The new sizes will pop up like tulips in the spring. And they will FIT the kid’s needs!
By: letschooseschools on October 3, 2008
at 4:20 am
The Texas Scholarship Lottery is open for registration! Go to my blog to register.
By: letschooseschools on October 15, 2008
at 4:38 am
In law, defamation (also called calumny, libel, slander, and vilification) is the communication of a statement that makes a false claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government or nation a negative image.
Here’s where you cross the line:
Allen’s campaign was largely paid for by a group called the Texas Parent PAC, and when the PAC said jump, Allen obediently said how high.
By: BCM on October 21, 2008
at 6:37 pm
Actually that’s where Vaught crossed the line. And local families of special needs children are smart enough to realize that a tool of a special interest group from outside the district is not going to help us. No way, no how.
Special needs families would elect a dead armadillo over wasting another 2 years on Allen Vaught. It just so happens that Vaught’s opponent is a guy who managed to get a lot of kids back in school. I understand that it’s bad for publicity and is hard to spin away, but enough with the threats, k?
By: Unworthy Bum on October 21, 2008
at 6:54 pm
BCM,
Is that legal advice or a threat?
Friend of Allen?
Holding the jumprope perhaps?
Obediently?
By: Jump Allen Jump on October 21, 2008
at 9:17 pm
BCM,
Thanks for the dictionary lesson. As you posted, defamation involves making false allegations. False being the key word.
Are you saying that Vaught did not accept campaign funds from the Parent PAC? Making allegations that are true but inconvenient or uncomfortable does not qualify.
You accused this blogger of slander, which is defamation in oral form. I believe you meant to accuse her of libel, which is kind of funny, actually, because your written accusation of her slandering Vaught by lying when she blogs the truth would constitute one and the same.
By: It's all about the money on October 22, 2008
at 12:25 am
To some it is ‘all about the money,” Mr. Keffer.
By: puppet on October 23, 2008
at 3:41 am